Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
During expert witness John Edward Philips' testimony at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Wednesday, defense counselor Dorothee Le Fraper du Hellen questioned an important link between two phones attributed to unnamed Subject 3 .In this case, Philips claimed two phones – a green network and a purple network phone – both belonged to Subject 3 .However, Le Fraper du Hellen asserted that Philips' analysis was too narrow and failed to account for other potential phones used by Subject 3 . Later on, Le Fraper du Hellen questioned the prosecution's decision to only analyze the connection between various phones attributed to Subject 3 starting Sept. 24, 2004 .
Interest, but Chinese investments uncertain
STL defense claims confirmation bias in cell analysis
Phoenicia launches culinary institute, raises money for autism
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE